header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 17 February 2023

17 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Citizenship

R (on the application of Roehrig) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 31 (Admin), [2023] All ER (D) 04 (Feb)

The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant’s judicial review claim, challenging the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse to grant him a British passport. The claimant had contended that, at his birth in October 2000, he had become a British citizen by virtue of s 1(1)(b) of the British Nationality Act 1981 (BNA 1981) because, on that date, his French mother (who had then been resident in the UK by virtue of her status as a worker who was a citizen of an EU member state) had been settled in the UK, within the meaning of BNA 1981. The question of whether the claimant had acquired British citizenship on his birth depended on whether the mother had been subject to immigration laws, such that she had not been settled for the purposes of BNA 1981when the claimant had been born. The court held that: (i) the Immigration (European Economic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll