header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 July 2026

Company

Re Poundland Ltd [2025] EWHC 2755 (Ch)

The Chancery Division approved a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 for Poundland Ltd, a discount retailer facing imminent insolvency. The court held that the evidence was clear that, but for the implementation of some sort of restructuring plan or refinancing, Poundland was due to become cashflow insolvent within days of the sanction hearing. The plan was approved in the light of Poundland’s financial difficulties. The court held that all requisite conditions had been complied with. While some creditor classes voted against the plan, including most landlord classes, the court exercised its ‘cram down’ power to bind dissenting classes (unsecured creditors) after finding that: (i) no member of the dissenting classes would be worse off under the plan than in the relevant alternative (administration); (ii) at least one class of creditors who would have a genuine economic interest in the relevant alternative had approved the plan; and (iii) the plan represented a fair sharing of the burdens and benefits

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
back-to-top-scroll