header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 July 2026

Company

Re Poundland Ltd [2025] EWHC 2755 (Ch)

The Chancery Division approved a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 for Poundland Ltd, a discount retailer facing imminent insolvency. The court held that the evidence was clear that, but for the implementation of some sort of restructuring plan or refinancing, Poundland was due to become cashflow insolvent within days of the sanction hearing. The plan was approved in the light of Poundland’s financial difficulties. The court held that all requisite conditions had been complied with. While some creditor classes voted against the plan, including most landlord classes, the court exercised its ‘cram down’ power to bind dissenting classes (unsecured creditors) after finding that: (i) no member of the dissenting classes would be worse off under the plan than in the relevant alternative (administration); (ii) at least one class of creditors who would have a genuine economic interest in the relevant alternative had approved the plan; and (iii) the plan represented a fair sharing of the burdens and benefits

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll