header-logo header-logo

18 February 2022
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 18 February 2022

Criminal law

Pwr v Director of Public Prosecutions; Akdogan and another v Director of ­Public Prosecutions [2022] UKSC 2, [2022] All ER (D) 84 (Jan)

The Supreme Court (the court) held that s 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000), which provided that it was a criminal offence for a person in a public place to carry or display an article ‘in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation’, was a strict liability offence. Further, the court ruled that s 13(1) was compatible with art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Accordingly, the court dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the Divisional Court’s decision, dismissing their appeal by way of case stated, concerning their conviction for an offence under TA 2000 s 13(1), namely carrying a flag of the Kurdistan Workers Party (an organisation proscribed under TA 2000) during a demonstration against the perceived actions of the Turkish state in north-eastern Syria.


Judicial review

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll