header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 18 February 2022

18 February 2022
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal law

Pwr v Director of Public Prosecutions; Akdogan and another v Director of ­Public Prosecutions [2022] UKSC 2, [2022] All ER (D) 84 (Jan)

The Supreme Court (the court) held that s 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000), which provided that it was a criminal offence for a person in a public place to carry or display an article ‘in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation’, was a strict liability offence. Further, the court ruled that s 13(1) was compatible with art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Accordingly, the court dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the Divisional Court’s decision, dismissing their appeal by way of case stated, concerning their conviction for an offence under TA 2000 s 13(1), namely carrying a flag of the Kurdistan Workers Party (an organisation proscribed under TA 2000) during a demonstration against the perceived actions of the Turkish state in north-eastern Syria.


Judicial review

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll