header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 March 2021

Contract

Motacus Constructions Ltd v Paolo Castelli SpA [2021] EWHC 356 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 33 (Mar)

The claimant company’s application for summary judgment to enforce the decision of an adjudicator in a construction dispute succeeded. The defendant company’s sole defence was that the judgment was unenforceable in the English courts. The Technology and Construction Court held that there had been no need for the British government to make any declaration in respect of construction contracts under and in accordance with art 21 of the 2005 Hague Convention, because the enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision was already permitted by art 7. An application for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision was an interim measure of protection within art 7 of the convention. The court was not required to suspend or dismiss the proceedings.


European arrest warrant

Svishtov Regional Prosecutor’s Office v PI C-648/20 PPU, [2021] All ER (D) 39 (Mar)

The Advocate General’s Opinion proposed that the Court of Justice of the European Union should answer the question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll