header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 March 2021

Contract

Motacus Constructions Ltd v Paolo Castelli SpA [2021] EWHC 356 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 33 (Mar)

The claimant company’s application for summary judgment to enforce the decision of an adjudicator in a construction dispute succeeded. The defendant company’s sole defence was that the judgment was unenforceable in the English courts. The Technology and Construction Court held that there had been no need for the British government to make any declaration in respect of construction contracts under and in accordance with art 21 of the 2005 Hague Convention, because the enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision was already permitted by art 7. An application for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision was an interim measure of protection within art 7 of the convention. The court was not required to suspend or dismiss the proceedings.


European arrest warrant

Svishtov Regional Prosecutor’s Office v PI C-648/20 PPU, [2021] All ER (D) 39 (Mar)

The Advocate General’s Opinion proposed that the Court of Justice of the European Union should answer the question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll