header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Law digests: 23 February 2024

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
23 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11, [2024] All ER (D) 59 (Feb)

The Family Court ruled on the course of action that needed to be taken after the parties had chosen to divorce, and the husband’s (H) ES2 total figure, which was provisional, was £183m, of which approximately £163m represented his estimate of the business values. The wife (W) expressed some suspicion about H’s approach to valuing the businesses, believing that he would have sought to have depreciated their true worth. It fell to be determined whether a Single Joint Expert (SJE) should have been appointed. The court held, among other things, that the correct course of action had been for the implementation of a SJE instruction since a SJE report would have been likely to have given the parties a more secure evidential foundation for the FDR than two solely instructed reports.

Landlord & tenant

Jacobs v Chalcot Crescent (Management) Company Ltd [2024] EWHC 259 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 63 (Feb)

The Chancery Division ruled on the claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll