header-logo header-logo

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 23 September 2022

Company

Re Nostrum Oil & Gas plc [2022] EWHC 2249 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 02 (Sep)

The Chancery Division allowed the application, pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 Pt 26, for an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement (the scheme) between the applicant, the parent company of a corporate group which operates an oil and gas business in Kazakhstan, and its scheme creditors, a number of whom have been made the targets of EU, UK, and US sanctions as a result of the war in Ukraine. As such, those creditors were ‘sanctions disqualified persons’ who had been prohibited from dealing with the two unsecured notes to which the scheme relates. Among other things, the court held that: (i) even if the sanctions disqualified persons had been permitted to vote on the scheme, the statutory majority would have been obtained; (ii) although the scheme consideration would be held for the sanctions disqualified persons on bare trust until they ceased to be subject to sanctions, the scheme was ‘fair’ as it is not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll