header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 23 September 2022

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Nostrum Oil & Gas plc [2022] EWHC 2249 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 02 (Sep)

The Chancery Division allowed the application, pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 Pt 26, for an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement (the scheme) between the applicant, the parent company of a corporate group which operates an oil and gas business in Kazakhstan, and its scheme creditors, a number of whom have been made the targets of EU, UK, and US sanctions as a result of the war in Ukraine. As such, those creditors were ‘sanctions disqualified persons’ who had been prohibited from dealing with the two unsecured notes to which the scheme relates. Among other things, the court held that: (i) even if the sanctions disqualified persons had been permitted to vote on the scheme, the statutory majority would have been obtained; (ii) although the scheme consideration would be held for the sanctions disqualified persons on bare trust until they ceased to be subject to sanctions, the scheme was ‘fair’ as it is not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll