header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 23 September 2022

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Nostrum Oil & Gas plc [2022] EWHC 2249 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 02 (Sep)

The Chancery Division allowed the application, pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 Pt 26, for an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement (the scheme) between the applicant, the parent company of a corporate group which operates an oil and gas business in Kazakhstan, and its scheme creditors, a number of whom have been made the targets of EU, UK, and US sanctions as a result of the war in Ukraine. As such, those creditors were ‘sanctions disqualified persons’ who had been prohibited from dealing with the two unsecured notes to which the scheme relates. Among other things, the court held that: (i) even if the sanctions disqualified persons had been permitted to vote on the scheme, the statutory majority would have been obtained; (ii) although the scheme consideration would be held for the sanctions disqualified persons on bare trust until they ceased to be subject to sanctions, the scheme was ‘fair’ as it is not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll