header-logo header-logo

27 September 2024
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 September 2024

Employment

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29, [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Sep)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant, PGMOL’s, appeal. PGMOL was a non-profit service company providing referees to league football matches in the UK and FA Cup fixtures. The part-time referees were paid match fees, expenses and were eligible for bonuses based on performance. The case concerned whether PGMOL was liable to make deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions in respect of these part-time referees to the respondent (HMRC). The issues were whether two key elements for the establishment of an employment contract were present. It was held that the minimum requirements of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for a contract of employment between the National Group referees and PGMOL were satisfied in relation to the individual contracts. In light of its conclusion that these minimum requirements were met, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) for it to decide whether the individual contracts were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll