header-logo header-logo

27 September 2024
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 September 2024

Employment

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29, [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Sep)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant, PGMOL’s, appeal. PGMOL was a non-profit service company providing referees to league football matches in the UK and FA Cup fixtures. The part-time referees were paid match fees, expenses and were eligible for bonuses based on performance. The case concerned whether PGMOL was liable to make deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions in respect of these part-time referees to the respondent (HMRC). The issues were whether two key elements for the establishment of an employment contract were present. It was held that the minimum requirements of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for a contract of employment between the National Group referees and PGMOL were satisfied in relation to the individual contracts. In light of its conclusion that these minimum requirements were met, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) for it to decide whether the individual contracts were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll