header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 27 September 2024

27 September 2024
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29, [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Sep)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant, PGMOL’s, appeal. PGMOL was a non-profit service company providing referees to league football matches in the UK and FA Cup fixtures. The part-time referees were paid match fees, expenses and were eligible for bonuses based on performance. The case concerned whether PGMOL was liable to make deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions in respect of these part-time referees to the respondent (HMRC). The issues were whether two key elements for the establishment of an employment contract were present. It was held that the minimum requirements of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for a contract of employment between the National Group referees and PGMOL were satisfied in relation to the individual contracts. In light of its conclusion that these minimum requirements were met, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) for it to decide whether the individual contracts were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll