header-logo header-logo

27 September 2024
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 September 2024

Employment

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29, [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Sep)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant, PGMOL’s, appeal. PGMOL was a non-profit service company providing referees to league football matches in the UK and FA Cup fixtures. The part-time referees were paid match fees, expenses and were eligible for bonuses based on performance. The case concerned whether PGMOL was liable to make deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions in respect of these part-time referees to the respondent (HMRC). The issues were whether two key elements for the establishment of an employment contract were present. It was held that the minimum requirements of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for a contract of employment between the National Group referees and PGMOL were satisfied in relation to the individual contracts. In light of its conclusion that these minimum requirements were met, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) for it to decide whether the individual contracts were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll