header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 May 2026

Arbitration

Kanametova v OSG Records Management (Europe) Ltd [2026] EWHC 1196 (Comm)

The King’s Bench Division dismissed the claimant’s challenge under s 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against the arbitral tribunal’s award that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the dispute. The claimant, Zalina Kanametova, former general director of OSG Records Management Centre LLC (OSG Russia), sought to enforce a long-term incentive agreement (LTI agreement) dated 1 October 2015 against OSG Records Management (Europe) Limited (OSG), claiming approximately USD$1.3m. The LTI agreement purportedly provided for a bonus calculated by reference to OSG’s equity value, payable upon sale by Elbrus Capital Funds of its shareholdings. OSG challenged the tribunal’s jurisdiction, alleging the LTI agreement was fraudulently backdated and executed between February and May 2020, not October 2015 as claimed. Following a three-day arbitration hearing, the tribunal found the agreement was signed in 2020 and backdated. The claimant challenged this award, bearing the burden of proving the LTI agreement’s validity on the balance of probabilities. The court conducted a complete rehearing and found,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll