header-logo header-logo

04 March 2022
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 March 2022

Adjudication

Steve Ward Services (UK) Ltd v Davies & Davies Associates Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 153, All ER (D) 70 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the Technology and Construction Court that an adjudicator was entitled to recover his fees in circumstances where he had resigned because he did not consider that he had the necessary jurisdiction to decide the dispute. The respondent adjudicator issued proceedings to recover his fees in an adjudication brought by the appellant. The court held, among other things, that (i) there was a real jurisdictional issue in the adjudication; (ii) the respondent was entitled to decline jurisdiction and resign in consequence; (iii) the judge’s construction of clause 1 of the respondent’s terms and conditions to mean that he was entitled to be paid fees for the work he had done, unless there had been an act of bad faith on his part was correct; (iv) the respondent was not guilty of bad faith; (v) the Unfair Contract

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll