header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Case law , In Court
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 6 November 2020

Arbitration

Haley v Haley [2020] EWCA Civ 1369, [2020] All ER (D) 110 (Oct)

In family proceedings where one party challenged an arbitral award made in the context of litigation concerning applications for financial remedies following divorce, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, found that challenges to an arbitral award were not limited to the statutory challenges found under the Arbitration Act 1996. The ‘appeals test’ in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2955), could be applied to determine whether the court should have declined to make an order in the terms of an arbitral award. Accordingly, the court could exercise its discretion and decline to make an order in the terms of the arbitral award, and could substitute its own order instead, if it determined that the arbitral award was wrong.


European Union

Burgo Group SpA v Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA - GSE C-92/19, [2020] All ER (D) 70 (Oct)

Article 12(3) of Directive (EC) 2004/8 should be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which allowed cogeneration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll