header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 8 April 2022

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Citizenship

R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case [2022] UKSC 3, [2022] All ER (D) 06 (Feb)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division which had held that the fee charged to children applying to be registered as British citizens under the British Nationality Act 1981 fixed at £1,012 pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality (Fees) Regulations 2018 (the Regulations), SI 2018/330, made under the Immigration Act 2014 (IA 2014), was lawful. Applying rules of statutory interpretation, the court held that IA 2014 in authorising the Secretary of State to set the fees had not imposed any criterion of affordability. On the contrary, it had expressly empowered the Secretary of State to set fees at levels which (i) took account of benefits likely to accrue from citizenship and (ii) could subsidise the cost of the exercise of other functions in connection with immigration or nationality, thereby

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll