header-logo header-logo

Law firm laundry

03 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Regulators have placed six law firms in ongoing ‘disciplinary processes’ as a result of ‘serious concerns’ over money laundering uncovered during a review of 50 firms.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) review focused on compliance with the more stringent demands of regulations introduced last June (the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financial and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/692)).

While most of the firms, which included both large and small firms, had good training processes in place and were doing appropriate customer due diligence, others were not doing enough to comply.

Across all 50 firms, only 69% of files reviewed had written evidence that the risk had been assessed. And only a third (17 firms) had a firm-wide risk assessment in place or were in the process of implementing one.

In the past three years, concerns over money laundering has led the SRA to close down eight firms, with a further 14 closing voluntarily. It has referred 49 solicitors and two other firms to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This has resulted in 12 strike-offs, 13 suspensions and fines of more than £800,000.

The SRA has now issued a warning notice, highlighting possible indicators of criminal activity such as overly secretive clients and clients acting through third parties.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘The credibility of law firms makes them an obvious target for criminals wishing to launder money.

‘Tackling it is crucial not only to maintain trust in the profession, but also for the good of society. Money laundering is not a victimless crime—it helps fund terrorism and those involved in drug trafficking and people smuggling.

‘We are encouraged that most firms seem to be on top of the issues, but all firms in scope must now comply with the new regulations. If firms do not step up and treat this issue with the seriousness it deserves, we will take action.’

According to the National Crime Agency, money laundering is likely to cost the UK more than £24bn a year.

Meanwhile, MPs and Peers have published a report on the Sanctions and Anti Money Laundering Bill.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights, chaired by Harriet Harman MP, supported the use of targeted sanctions to combat terrorists and human rights abusers but warned there is a risk individuals or organisations may be wrongly sanctioned, for example, because of mistaken identity.

It asked that there be a strong presumption that the names of those refused entry to the UK, and the reasons for this, be made public. It also highlighted the need for due process for designated person and called for early publication of guidelines on exemptions.

Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll