header-logo header-logo

03 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Law firm laundry

Regulators have placed six law firms in ongoing ‘disciplinary processes’ as a result of ‘serious concerns’ over money laundering uncovered during a review of 50 firms.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) review focused on compliance with the more stringent demands of regulations introduced last June (the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financial and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/692)).

While most of the firms, which included both large and small firms, had good training processes in place and were doing appropriate customer due diligence, others were not doing enough to comply.

Across all 50 firms, only 69% of files reviewed had written evidence that the risk had been assessed. And only a third (17 firms) had a firm-wide risk assessment in place or were in the process of implementing one.

In the past three years, concerns over money laundering has led the SRA to close down eight firms, with a further 14 closing voluntarily. It has referred 49 solicitors and two other firms to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This has resulted in 12 strike-offs, 13 suspensions and fines of more than £800,000.

The SRA has now issued a warning notice, highlighting possible indicators of criminal activity such as overly secretive clients and clients acting through third parties.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘The credibility of law firms makes them an obvious target for criminals wishing to launder money.

‘Tackling it is crucial not only to maintain trust in the profession, but also for the good of society. Money laundering is not a victimless crime—it helps fund terrorism and those involved in drug trafficking and people smuggling.

‘We are encouraged that most firms seem to be on top of the issues, but all firms in scope must now comply with the new regulations. If firms do not step up and treat this issue with the seriousness it deserves, we will take action.’

According to the National Crime Agency, money laundering is likely to cost the UK more than £24bn a year.

Meanwhile, MPs and Peers have published a report on the Sanctions and Anti Money Laundering Bill.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights, chaired by Harriet Harman MP, supported the use of targeted sanctions to combat terrorists and human rights abusers but warned there is a risk individuals or organisations may be wrongly sanctioned, for example, because of mistaken identity.

It asked that there be a strong presumption that the names of those refused entry to the UK, and the reasons for this, be made public. It also highlighted the need for due process for designated person and called for early publication of guidelines on exemptions.

Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll