header-logo header-logo

Construction law—Adjudication—Jurisdiction

23 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Balfour Beatty Engineering Services (HY) Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd, [2009] EWHC 2218 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 125 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court,  Akenhead J, 1 September 2009

The Technology and Construction Court has considered authority on jurisdiction and bias in the context of adjudicators under construction contracts.

Martin Bowdery QC (instructed by Mayer Brown International LLP) for the claimant. Stephen Furst QC (instructed by Hawkswell Kilvington) for the defendant.

The defendant was the main contractor on a project at Castle Hill Hospital, Hull. It sub-contracted part of the works to the claimant. Delays occurred and a dispute arose as to whether extensions of time had been due to the claimant. In September 2008, the claimant served a notice of adjudication on the defendant and an adjudicator was appointed (the first adjudicator).

The adjudication notice limited the dispute to the defendant’s right to make deductions and the claimant’s entitlement to an extension of time because of the defendant’s failure to provide the claimant with access to commence the works. The notice specified that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll