header-logo header-logo

23 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Construction law—Adjudication—Jurisdiction

Balfour Beatty Engineering Services (HY) Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd, [2009] EWHC 2218 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 125 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court,  Akenhead J, 1 September 2009

The Technology and Construction Court has considered authority on jurisdiction and bias in the context of adjudicators under construction contracts.

Martin Bowdery QC (instructed by Mayer Brown International LLP) for the claimant. Stephen Furst QC (instructed by Hawkswell Kilvington) for the defendant.

The defendant was the main contractor on a project at Castle Hill Hospital, Hull. It sub-contracted part of the works to the claimant. Delays occurred and a dispute arose as to whether extensions of time had been due to the claimant. In September 2008, the claimant served a notice of adjudication on the defendant and an adjudicator was appointed (the first adjudicator).

The adjudication notice limited the dispute to the defendant’s right to make deductions and the claimant’s entitlement to an extension of time because of the defendant’s failure to provide the claimant with access to commence the works. The notice specified that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll