header-logo header-logo

Pension—Maladministration of scheme—Report by Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration

30 October 2009
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Equitable Members Action Group) v HM Treasury and others [2009] EWHC 2495 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 163 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Divisional Court, Carnwath LJ and Gross J, 15 October 2009

The Divisional Court has given further consideration to the circumstances under which the responsible minister is entitled to reject recommendations by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the ombudsman).

Dinah Rose QC, Javan Herberg, Stephen Grosz and Jessica Boyd (instructed by Bindmans LLP) for the claimant. Clive Lewis QC, Paul Nicholls and Deok Joo Rhee (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant. Tony Child (instructed by Beachcroft LLP) for the interested parties. Jason Coppel (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the intervener.

The claimant was a company limited by guarantee whose members comprised about 21,000 current and former policyholders with the Equitable Life Assurance Society (Equitable). The claim concerned the government’s response, announced in Parliament in January 2009, to a report by the ombudsman entitled Equitable Life: A Decade of Regulatory Failure of July

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll