header-logo header-logo

05 November 2009
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Police—Disclosure of information

R (on the application of L) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (secretary of state for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3

Supreme Court, Lord Hope (deputy president), Lord Saville, Lord Scott, Lord Brown and Lord Neuberger, 29 October 2009

In determining whether to disclose non-criminal related information retained in police records in connection with an application to work with vulnerable persons, the police have to give due weight to the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, but disclosure will not necessarily breach the applicant’s right, for example if the information is true and relevant, and the recipient is entitled to be apprised of the information.

Stephen Cragg and Charlotte Kilroy (instructed by John Ford Solicitors) for the claimant. Fiona Barton and Matthew Holdcroft (instructed by the Metropolitan Police Directorate of Legal Services) for the defendant. James Eadie QC and Jason Coppel (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State for the Home Department, intervening. Timothy Pitt-Payne (instructed by Liberty) for Liberty, intervening, by written representations.

The claimant obtained a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll