header-logo header-logo

Bankruptcy-Appeal-Appeal from bankruptcy order

21 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Ross and another v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWHC 13 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Henderson J, 12 January 2010

The relevant test to be applied in deciding whether a refusal to accept an offer was reasonable, pursuant to s 271 of the Insolvency Act 1986, is whether a reasonable creditor, in the position of the petitioning creditor, and in the light of the actual history as disclosed to the court, would have accepted or refused the offer.

The debtors appeared in person. Jonathan Lopian (instructed by the Solicitor for Her Majesties Revenue Commissioners) for HMRC.

The appeal before the court concerned bankruptcy orders made against the two debtors in July 2009. Both were solicitors, and former partners. The petitioning creditors were the commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

The commissioners had served statutory demands on the debtors in respect of unpaid partnership and self assessment tax liabilities. No applications were made to set aside the statutory demand. Bankruptcy petitions were presented.

The debtors offered a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll