header-logo header-logo

21 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy-Appeal-Appeal from bankruptcy order

Ross and another v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWHC 13 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Henderson J, 12 January 2010

The relevant test to be applied in deciding whether a refusal to accept an offer was reasonable, pursuant to s 271 of the Insolvency Act 1986, is whether a reasonable creditor, in the position of the petitioning creditor, and in the light of the actual history as disclosed to the court, would have accepted or refused the offer.

The debtors appeared in person. Jonathan Lopian (instructed by the Solicitor for Her Majesties Revenue Commissioners) for HMRC.

The appeal before the court concerned bankruptcy orders made against the two debtors in July 2009. Both were solicitors, and former partners. The petitioning creditors were the commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

The commissioners had served statutory demands on the debtors in respect of unpaid partnership and self assessment tax liabilities. No applications were made to set aside the statutory demand. Bankruptcy petitions were presented.

The debtors offered a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll