header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Privacy—Stop and search provisions

21 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Gillan and another v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 4158/05, [2010] All ER (D) 40 (Jan)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Garlicki (President), Bratza, Bonello, Mijovic, Hirvela, Bianku and Vucinic, and L Early (Section Registrar), 12 January 2010

The powers of authorisation and confirmation as well as those of stop and search under ss 44 and 45 of the Terrorism Act 2000  are neither sufficiently circumscribed nor subject to adequate legal safeguards against abuse. They accordingly constitute a violation of the right to privacy under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

The applicants were each stopped and searched by police officers under s 45 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000). Under that section the power to stop and search could be exercised only for the purpose of searching for articles of a kind which could be used in connection with terrorism and could be exercised whether or not the constable had grounds for suspecting the presence of such articles. There was no requirement that the constable have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll