header-logo header-logo

Practice—Injunction—Injunction against rest of world

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

TUV v Person or Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 156 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Eady J, 22 Apr 2010

When seeking an injunction against persons unknown in respect of copyrighted material, an applicant should generally be required only to serve those in the media whom it has reason to believe would have an interest in the story.

Richard Spearman QC (instructed by Schillings) for the applicant.

The applicant’s laptop was stolen in a burglary. It contained electronic information, including visual images of the applicant and other persons. A friend had made an assignment of copyright to the applicant in anticipation of the instant proceedings. The individuals who stole the laptop had not been identified. The applicant obtained an interim injunction without notice against “persons unknown”. The order was based primarily upon claims to be brought to restrain infringement of privacy and possible breaches of copyright. The order contained provisions relating to anonymity and restricting access to the documents on the court file. There were also obligations imposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll