header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Company—Administrator—Costs of administration

Re Johnson Machine and Tool Ltd and others Re Empire Surfacing Ltd [2010] EWHC 582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 271 (May)

Chancery Division, Judge Purle QC sitting as a judge of the High Court, 27 May 2010

In considering whether to treat pre-appointment administration costs as an administration expense in respect of pre-pack administrations, the court has to compare whether the advantage to the purchasing directors in retaining a business shorn of debt was clearly outweighed by the advantage derived by creditors from the pre-pack administration.

Stephen Eyre and Angus Burden (instructed by The Wilkes Partnership) for the applicants.

Two cases before the court raised the issue of whether it was appropriate to order that the pre–appointment costs of an insolvency practitioner in the case of a “pre–pack” administration be treated as an administration expense. In each case a company controlled by or connected with the existing directors and owners was to purchase the existing business and assets from the administrator immediately following his appointment.

Judge Purle QC:

The legitimacy of pre–packs and the jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll