header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Company—Administrator—Costs of administration

Re Johnson Machine and Tool Ltd and others Re Empire Surfacing Ltd [2010] EWHC 582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 271 (May)

Chancery Division, Judge Purle QC sitting as a judge of the High Court, 27 May 2010

In considering whether to treat pre-appointment administration costs as an administration expense in respect of pre-pack administrations, the court has to compare whether the advantage to the purchasing directors in retaining a business shorn of debt was clearly outweighed by the advantage derived by creditors from the pre-pack administration.

Stephen Eyre and Angus Burden (instructed by The Wilkes Partnership) for the applicants.

Two cases before the court raised the issue of whether it was appropriate to order that the pre–appointment costs of an insolvency practitioner in the case of a “pre–pack” administration be treated as an administration expense. In each case a company controlled by or connected with the existing directors and owners was to purchase the existing business and assets from the administrator immediately following his appointment.

Judge Purle QC:

The legitimacy of pre–packs and the jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll