header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Jurisdiction—Armed forces

08 July 2010
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2010] UKSC 29, [2010] All ER (D) 261 (Jun)

Supreme Court, 30 June 2010, Lord Phillips (president), Lord Hope (deputy president), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Kerr

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) does not apply to armed forces on foreign soil, and in any event there is no automatic right to an investigation into the death of a serviceman abroad.

Dinah Rose QC and Jessica Simor (instructed by Hodge Jones & Allen) for the claimant. James Eadie QC, Pushpinder Saini QC, Sarah Moore and David Barr (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Michael Beloff QC, Raza Husain QC and Elizabeth Prochaska (instructed by Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the intervener.

The claimant’s son was a member of the territorial army. He was mobilised for service in Iraq in June 2003. After a short period of acclimatisation in Kuwait, he was sent to a base in Iraq.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll