header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Will—Testator—Testamentary capacity

Perrins v Holland [2010] EWCA Civ 840, [2010] All ER (D) 210 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Moore-Bick and Jackson LJJ, 21 July 2010

Parker v Felgate LR 8 PD 171 remains good law. What is required is due execution of a will which the court can be satisfied expresses the wishes of a testator at a time when he did have full testamentary capacity and has not been subsequently revoked.

Penelope Reed QC and James Quirke (instructed by Tyndallwoods) for the claimant. John Randall QC and Angus Burden (instructed by Williamson and Soden) for the defendants.

The testator was born in 1955. In 1991 he was found to have primary progressive multiple sclerosis. By early 2000 he was confined to a wheelchair, and had little control over his movements. He married in 1977. One child, the claimant, was born in 1986. The testator and his wife separated in 1993, and the following year met the third defendant who became his carer; he wished to marry her. He divorced his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll