header-logo header-logo

05 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs
printer mail-detail

Law Reports Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Removal from office

Donaldson and another v O’Sullivan and another [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393

Court of Appeal, Civil Division; Ward, Dyson and Lloyd LJJ; 30 July 2008

Section 303(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) confers power on the court to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy, which it can exercise so as to replace a trustee removed under s 298 of IA 1986. That is also the position in compulsory liquidations under s 168(3).

Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Morgans) for the applicant. Christopher Brockman (instructed by Meade King) for the respondent. Richard Ritchie (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the official receiver.

The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy with liabilities still outstanding. In 2006, her trustee in bankruptcy applied for a block transfer order which would have the effect of removing him from office as trustee in bankruptcy of the appellant, and appointing the respondent in his place. The judge allowed the trustee’s application, however, the respondent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll