header-logo header-logo

05 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs
printer mail-detail

Law Reports Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Removal from office

Donaldson and another v O’Sullivan and another [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393

Court of Appeal, Civil Division; Ward, Dyson and Lloyd LJJ; 30 July 2008

Section 303(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) confers power on the court to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy, which it can exercise so as to replace a trustee removed under s 298 of IA 1986. That is also the position in compulsory liquidations under s 168(3).

Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Morgans) for the applicant. Christopher Brockman (instructed by Meade King) for the respondent. Richard Ritchie (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the official receiver.

The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy with liabilities still outstanding. In 2006, her trustee in bankruptcy applied for a block transfer order which would have the effect of removing him from office as trustee in bankruptcy of the appellant, and appointing the respondent in his place. The judge allowed the trustee’s application, however, the respondent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll