header-logo header-logo

Law Society storage ruling

12 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The High Court has held that the Law Society can destroy files relating to poorly performing firms which cost it £344,000 per year to store.

The 1.5 million files come from Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) interventions into law firms. The Law Society archived the files but could not destroy them due to concerns over practice money held under statutory trust.

Delivering judgment in The Law Society (Solicitors Regulation Authority) [2015] EWHC 166 (Ch), Iain Purvis QC said the court must weigh “the cost and inconvenience of retaining the files, together with the data protection risks involved in doing so” against “the risk of damage to clients through the loss of documents of real value if the files are destroyed”.

He made an order that would allow the immediate backlog of files to be destroyed and for future files to be destroyed after seven years.

Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll