header-logo header-logo

12 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Society storage ruling

The High Court has held that the Law Society can destroy files relating to poorly performing firms which cost it £344,000 per year to store.

The 1.5 million files come from Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) interventions into law firms. The Law Society archived the files but could not destroy them due to concerns over practice money held under statutory trust.

Delivering judgment in The Law Society (Solicitors Regulation Authority) [2015] EWHC 166 (Ch), Iain Purvis QC said the court must weigh “the cost and inconvenience of retaining the files, together with the data protection risks involved in doing so” against “the risk of damage to clients through the loss of documents of real value if the files are destroyed”.

He made an order that would allow the immediate backlog of files to be destroyed and for future files to be destroyed after seven years.

Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll