header-logo header-logo

Law Society storage ruling

12 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The High Court has held that the Law Society can destroy files relating to poorly performing firms which cost it £344,000 per year to store.

The 1.5 million files come from Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) interventions into law firms. The Law Society archived the files but could not destroy them due to concerns over practice money held under statutory trust.

Delivering judgment in The Law Society (Solicitors Regulation Authority) [2015] EWHC 166 (Ch), Iain Purvis QC said the court must weigh “the cost and inconvenience of retaining the files, together with the data protection risks involved in doing so” against “the risk of damage to clients through the loss of documents of real value if the files are destroyed”.

He made an order that would allow the immediate backlog of files to be destroyed and for future files to be destroyed after seven years.

Issue: 7640 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll