header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A law unto themselves

What drives vexatious litigants? B Mahendra reports

The spectrum of those dissatisfied with the processes of the law runs from the “barrack room lawyer” inveighing in saloon bars against judges and lawyers, through to the person preoccupied by one irksome decision—involving himself or someone close to him—to those who are truly successful in getting into the hair of the law, namely, the vexatious litigant.

These are persons who usually come to have a staggering knowledge of some area of the law, enough to put many specialist lawyers to shame, not to mention the law firms where they soon become persona non grata. An alphabetical list of those individuals who have been declared vexatious litigants is available on the HM Courts Service website. The list is surprisingly extensive suggesting that the undue preoccupation some individuals have with the law and their quest for justice, as they see it, is more widespread than may appear at first sight. Experience suggests that there is both a male as well as middle class bias to the background of these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll