header-logo header-logo

02 November 2016
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers advocate a total ban on ivory

penelope_nevill_barrister_

Barristers and solicitors have worked closely together pro bono to help save the African elephant, at risk of extinction from illegal poaching and ivory trafficking.

The Stop Ivory campaign has released a Legal Opinion drafted by Penelope Nevill of 20 Essex Street (pictured), Mishcon de Reya and Blackstone Chambers. The Opinion notes the emerging international consensus that the only way to stop illegal poaching and ivory trafficking is to close all domestic ivory markets.

It considers how a total ban on the sale of ivory might be implemented into UK law, and the risks of a successful legal challenge being brought to any domestic ban that might be introduced. A total ban would interfere with free movement rights in EU law and the right to property under EU law and the European Convention on Human Rights. A judicial review could be brought by individuals in the antiques trade and auction houses or who own or have inherited ivory which a total ban would render commercially worthless. However, the Opinion puts forward the view that a total ban can reasonably be defended, and the “precautionary principle” can be invoked in support as there is a threat of serious or irreversible damage.

Nevill said working on a campaign “that brings together scientists, conservationists, NGOs, policy analysts and others from a wide range of backgrounds is excellent experience in seeing what works, which can be translated to other global problems”.

Alex Rhodes, Mishcon de Reya, said: “We are witnessing the end of the African elephant.

“One elephant is killed every 15 minutes, its tusks are cut off and illegally shipped to be traded as ivory products under cover of poorly regulated legal ivory markets overseas. This year, the world community has twice overwhelmingly passed resolutions that countries should close their domestic ivory markets. The British government has committed to deliver on its manifesto promise press for a total ban on the ivory trade in the UK.”

The campaign is just one example of the vast amount of valuable pro bono work carried out by the profession each year, which will be celebrated in National Pro Bono Week, 7-11 November.

Issue: 7721 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll