header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers welcome LASPO review

Post-implementation reviews for legal aid & civil litigation funding

The government has announced its long-awaited review of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

In a memorandum to the Justice select committee this week, David Lidington, the Lord Chancellor, committed the Ministry of Justice to producing post-implementation reviews for both legal aid and civil litigation funding.

According to the memorandum, the reviews will be ‘primarily concerned with assessing the reforms from an analytical perspective, in the manner of an impact assessment, rather than reporting certain elements of the Act’s implementation and operation’. Both reviews are scheduled for completion by the end of April 2018.

LASPO removed legal aid from whole areas of civil and family law in April 2013, as well as introducing Lord Justice Jackson’s civil litigation funding reforms. Since then, it has faced mounting criticism from within the legal profession, with members of the public often unable to find or afford vital legal advice on housing, family, immigration and social welfare issues.

Law Society President Joe Egan said: ‘This post-implementation appraisal by government is long-awaited and needs to be comprehensive. This Act meant hundreds of thousands of people eligible for legal aid on 31 March 2013 became ineligible the very next day.’

Andrew Landon QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘This review comes not a moment too soon.

The Bar Council will continue to press for a wide scope which includes the impact of LASPO on society and considers the combined and interactive effect of legal aid cuts with welfare and other civil justice reforms.’

In September, the Bach Commission published its review of legal aid, calling for reforms including more provision of legal help and the abolition of the Legal Aid Agency. In June, the Law Society published its report, Access denied? LASPO four years on, which found legal aid cuts had increased pressure on public services, as unresolved legal issues escalated into bigger problems. It made 25 recommendations, including reintroducing legal aid for early advice and improving exceptional case funding.

Issue: 7768 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll