header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid—a bleak future?

Is it too late to prevent a race towards low prices for minimum quality? asks Richard Miller

In these turbulent times when we don’t even know what payment structures legal aid firms will be working under in three months, it is an unenviable task to try to forecast where we will be in three to five years.

Of one thing I am certain. The system we end up with will not look anything like Lord Carter’s blueprint (see Legal Aid—A Market-based Approach to Reform). Some of it misunderstood the legal services market and would not work in practice. The Legal Services Commission (LSC) cannot or will not adopt some of the ideas. The government has repeated that there is no more money, which compromises the principle of competitive tendering.
The government is still putting £2bn per year into legal aid. Much of the work is subject to human rights obligations. The government must ensure access to services in criminal defence, public law, family, mental health and immigration, which account for around three-quarters of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll