header-logo header-logo

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

Milton Keynes NHS Foundation Trust v Hyde [2016] EWHC 72 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 158 (Feb)

The Queen’s Bench Division dismissed the defendant NHS’s Trust’s appeal against a decision of a master in relation to costs holding that where a party had exhausted the costs, that could be claimed under a Legal Aid certificate so that it was ‘spent’, it could in principle establish a discharge by conduct in the same manner as certificates in which all of the work up to a limitation of scope had been carried out and accordingly, ss 10(1) and 22(2) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 had been not been contravened.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll