header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid drop ‘concerning’

Applications for legal aid in civil cases where there was evidence of domestic violence or child abuse fell by 12% in the final quarter of 2020, according to government statistics
Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce described the decrease, in the Ministry of Justice legal aid statistics quarterly figures, as ‘concerning’.

‘At a time when we know there has been considerable escalation in domestic abuse cases, this reduction raises questions regarding the barrier to legal aid that the “domestic violence gateway” requirements represent and we continue to call on government to allow solicitors to certify that a person is a victim of abuse for the purposes of obtaining legal aid,’ she said.

The statistics, published last week, also recorded a 7% drop in applications for exceptional case funding and a 33% fall in housing work, compared to the same quarter in the previous year.

Boyce said: ‘For the Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme (HPCDS), there were only 461 cases compared to 7,740 in the same quarter for the previous year.

‘This reflects the government policy of suspending possession claims, which we support, but which demonstrates the considerable financial pressure that is being placed on the legal aid housing provider base due to the reduction in cashflow. We continue to call on government to provide additional financial support to ensure the provider base does not collapse.

‘We are also concerned by the continued decrease in exceptional case funding applications―this suggests the pandemic has increased the challenge in making these applications.’

Meanwhile, lawyers and interested parties are invited to respond to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid’s call for evidence before 7 May.

Sir Christopher Bellamy, Chair of the Review, wants to hear how the system as a whole can be improved and placed on a sustainable footing for the future. Submit responses to the review online at bit.ly/3fqtwNK or by email to iclar@justice.gov.uk.

 

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll