header-logo header-logo

Legal aid drop ‘concerning’

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
Applications for legal aid in civil cases where there was evidence of domestic violence or child abuse fell by 12% in the final quarter of 2020, according to government statistics
Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce described the decrease, in the Ministry of Justice legal aid statistics quarterly figures, as ‘concerning’.

‘At a time when we know there has been considerable escalation in domestic abuse cases, this reduction raises questions regarding the barrier to legal aid that the “domestic violence gateway” requirements represent and we continue to call on government to allow solicitors to certify that a person is a victim of abuse for the purposes of obtaining legal aid,’ she said.

The statistics, published last week, also recorded a 7% drop in applications for exceptional case funding and a 33% fall in housing work, compared to the same quarter in the previous year.

Boyce said: ‘For the Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme (HPCDS), there were only 461 cases compared to 7,740 in the same quarter for the previous year.

‘This reflects the government policy of suspending possession claims, which we support, but which demonstrates the considerable financial pressure that is being placed on the legal aid housing provider base due to the reduction in cashflow. We continue to call on government to provide additional financial support to ensure the provider base does not collapse.

‘We are also concerned by the continued decrease in exceptional case funding applications―this suggests the pandemic has increased the challenge in making these applications.’

Meanwhile, lawyers and interested parties are invited to respond to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid’s call for evidence before 7 May.

Sir Christopher Bellamy, Chair of the Review, wants to hear how the system as a whole can be improved and placed on a sustainable footing for the future. Submit responses to the review online at bit.ly/3fqtwNK or by email to iclar@justice.gov.uk.

 

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll