header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / John Ford
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid, judicial review & the fight for justice

nlj_7736_ford

The administrative & legal failings of the Legal Aid Agency need urgent examination, says John Ford

For over 30 years I have run a small and effective legal aid practice in North London focusing on working for people who depend on legal aid for advice and representation in public law disputes, including education and community care. We survive by doing high quality judicial review (JR) and other work, for which we are rewarded appropriately by awards of costs from defendants who have let our clients down.

Most of our work is completed before the high cost case limit is reached, but over the years we have been unable to cope with the inadequate rates of pay and increasingly difficult stance taken by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) in the assessment of legal aid and payment of our costs.

A third incarnation

The LAA is the third corporate incarnation of the publicly funded legal service in the last 30 years. Many of us remember the days when legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll