header-logo header-logo

Legal aid: spotlight on a crisis

03 December 2020 / Rohini Teather
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
33605
Without data on the damage done to legal aid, how can the government help this fractured system recover? Rohini Teather, Head of Parliamentary Affairs at LAPG, reports

If we have learned anything over the past nine months, it’s that coronavirus (COVID-19) is not an equal opportunities virus. The health and the economic consequences of the pandemic have hit the poorest and most vulnerable in our society the hardest—and had a similarly devastating effect on the social justice lawyers who serve them. Lawyers working in criminal and civil legal aid have not had a fee increase since the 1990s, which means their fees have decreased by 34% in real terms. With the sector already fragile after so many years of under-investment, it has struggled to absorb the financial impact of this year.

The pandemic has just made a bad situation worse. Those of us working in legal aid policy have been conscious of an absence of concrete data since the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll