header-logo header-logo

Legal aid tremors

01 October 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Three major fault lines exposed in current system

Legal aid is caught in a “vicious circle” and requires a fundamental review and “realignment” of three basic faults if it is to be maintained at a reasonable standard.

A report published this week by the Legal Services Institute (LSI)—a think tank funded by the College of Law—identifies three main “fault lines” in the current system: “a fragmented and inefficient supplier base, a failure to match rights and funding, and broader systemic shortcomings”.

The report, Civil Legal Aid: Squaring the (Vicious) Circle, finds that there are greater overhead costs than necessary because of the large number of suppliers of legal aid work, both for the Legal Services Commission and the law firms themselves, therefore best value for money is not being achieved. In addition, the report stated that the increasing number of legal rights afforded to citizens, many of which are aimed at the most disadvantaged in society, are not matched by an increased availability of funds to allow people to pursue those rights.

The report favours the development of single source contracting through CLACs and CLANs (Community Legal Advice Centres and Networks) and the use of graduated fee schemes to cut down on administrative costs. It notes that law firms face extra costs by having to bid for matter starts.
It suggests that advice delivered need not always be “high quality”, and calls for greater “utility of service”—advice that is useful to resolve the client’s problem.

The report states that “too often [the legal aid fund is] being asked to pay for something which is not sufficiently useful, because, for instance, lawyers are sitting on the fence or are fanning the flames of a dispute rather than working quickly to resolve it”.

LSI director, professor Stephen Mayson says: “If efficiency savings in legal aid lead to any undermining of the rule of law, or compromise the administration of or access to justice, while we might have achieved a degree of fiscal prudence, society will undoubtedly be the poorer for it.”

Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll