header-logo header-logo

Legal aid under pressure

08 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail
MPs are holding an inquiry into the future of legal aid, in light of difficulties getting legal aid assistance in some areas as well as lawyers’ concerns about fees, reduced work during the COVID-19 outbreak and other pressures

The Justice Committee issued a call for evidence this week and is keen to hear from practitioners and clients about their experience. The Committee, chaired by Sir Bob Neill QC MP, aims to look ahead to the next decade of legal aid, and to identify challenges facing clients and providers and how they might be tackled. It is especially keen to hear about the sustainability of the legal aid market, the impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology to deliver advice and representation.

The inquiry will also look at how LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) has affected access to justice. The Committee previously looked at civil legal aid following LASPO, in 2014, highlighting issues such as the increase in litigants in person and low take-up of the exceptional cases funding scheme. It looked into criminal legal aid in 2018,

The government’s own post-implementation review of LASPO, published in February 2019, concluded that LASPO had been ‘partially successful’ at meeting its four objectives of saving money, targeting legal aid at those who need it most, discouraging unnecessary litigation and delivering better value for money.

Law Society president Simon Davis said there were ‘swathes of the country with no or vanishingly little legal aid provision for issues such as housing and community care, as well as a dwindling number of criminal law solicitors, because the system for so long has been starved of funding.

‘Growing numbers of people are navigating the justice system unrepresented―with no legal advice to help them enforce their rights.’

Submit responses by 5pm on 19 October via: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll