header-logo header-logo

Legal aid under pressure

08 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail
MPs are holding an inquiry into the future of legal aid, in light of difficulties getting legal aid assistance in some areas as well as lawyers’ concerns about fees, reduced work during the COVID-19 outbreak and other pressures

The Justice Committee issued a call for evidence this week and is keen to hear from practitioners and clients about their experience. The Committee, chaired by Sir Bob Neill QC MP, aims to look ahead to the next decade of legal aid, and to identify challenges facing clients and providers and how they might be tackled. It is especially keen to hear about the sustainability of the legal aid market, the impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology to deliver advice and representation.

The inquiry will also look at how LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) has affected access to justice. The Committee previously looked at civil legal aid following LASPO, in 2014, highlighting issues such as the increase in litigants in person and low take-up of the exceptional cases funding scheme. It looked into criminal legal aid in 2018,

The government’s own post-implementation review of LASPO, published in February 2019, concluded that LASPO had been ‘partially successful’ at meeting its four objectives of saving money, targeting legal aid at those who need it most, discouraging unnecessary litigation and delivering better value for money.

Law Society president Simon Davis said there were ‘swathes of the country with no or vanishingly little legal aid provision for issues such as housing and community care, as well as a dwindling number of criminal law solicitors, because the system for so long has been starved of funding.

‘Growing numbers of people are navigating the justice system unrepresented―with no legal advice to help them enforce their rights.’

Submit responses by 5pm on 19 October via: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll