header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A legal entente cordiale?

Michael Nash is heartened by the proposed cross-fertilisation of Anglo & French legal systems

President Sarkozy’s recent announcement that he is intending to abolish the old system of investigating magistrates in France should come as no surprise. This is because cross-fertilisation of the two great legal systems of the Western world, the Common Law and the Civil Law, is no new thing.

There are, however, some surprising aspects to the announcement, and there is a thinly veiled subtext to the whole exercise, calling into question the balance of executive, legislative and judicial powers. Sarkozy was trained as a lawyer, following in his mother’s footsteps, but only practised for two years. His heart was not in it, having been given already to politics. Now he is seeking to combine these two disciplines.

It was what the president considered to be a particular abuse of power by an examining magistrate (the juge d’instruction) who ordered the dawn arrest and detention of a newspaper executive in a minor libel case, that made the president decide on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll