header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A legal entente cordiale?

Michael Nash is heartened by the proposed cross-fertilisation of Anglo & French legal systems

President Sarkozy’s recent announcement that he is intending to abolish the old system of investigating magistrates in France should come as no surprise. This is because cross-fertilisation of the two great legal systems of the Western world, the Common Law and the Civil Law, is no new thing.

There are, however, some surprising aspects to the announcement, and there is a thinly veiled subtext to the whole exercise, calling into question the balance of executive, legislative and judicial powers. Sarkozy was trained as a lawyer, following in his mother’s footsteps, but only practised for two years. His heart was not in it, having been given already to politics. Now he is seeking to combine these two disciplines.

It was what the president considered to be a particular abuse of power by an examining magistrate (the juge d’instruction) who ordered the dawn arrest and detention of a newspaper executive in a minor libel case, that made the president decide on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll