header-logo header-logo

Legal profession independence threatened

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Spending cuts, career politicians, media excess and consumerism are all combining to threaten the independence of the legal profession, says Bar chairman Tim Dutton QC.

Addressing the Criminal Bar Association conference in , Dutton said a shift in mindsets and attitudes was affecting the Bar’s ability as an independent profession to discharge its duties vigorously and independently. He said: “[One] influence is not just a desire to control expenditure—laudable in itself for us as taxpayers—but we have seen in recent years the use of expenditure controls to encroach upon our professional independence and judgment. “A combination of media excess and consumerism is creating an environment in which politicians and others attack the professions, and ours in particular. The irony is that those who launch attacks upon the profession are also the people who use it the most.”

He says that from an increasingly young age our “political class” is drawn from people who see politics as their career almost from university. “The fact that politics is now the ‘profession’ which politicians pursue means that some are unable from personal experience or adherence to professional codes and training to understand the significance within society of professions such as ours, the essential requirement that each of the liberal professions must remain independent, strong, and free to exercise professional judgments in the best interests of those for whom they act.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll