header-logo header-logo

Legal Services Board highlights consumer knowledge gap

07 January 2010
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Research suggests consumers lack basic information regarding legal services

The majority of the public have no idea what lawyers do, and only 14% “shop around” for the right lawyer.

Research commissioned by the Legal Services Board reveals a knowledge gap among consumers—less than a third of more than 2,000 adults surveyed in December last year felt they knew at least a “fair” amount of what it is lawyers do.

The figures suggest the public feels disempowered when it comes to comparing services and choosing their lawyer.

More than 60% of those taking part in the survey had personally used legal services, with 53% having used them at least once in the last five years. Three-quarters of them were satisfied or very satisfied with the legal advice they received.

The findings coincide with a new era of consumer-focused reform within the legal profession.

History was made on 1 January 2010 as a new regulatory regime affecting all lawyers came into effect.

A single body, the Legal Services Board, will now oversee the entire legal services sector, working with eight separate bodies named as approved regulators in the Legal Services Act 2007. David Edmonds, Legal Services Board chairman, says: “This research shows that consumers do not have the information or, sometimes, the skills to choose a lawyer based on their own assessment of quality or cost.

“The reforms to be brought about by the new regulatory framework have the potential to change the relationship between lawyers and the public.Our goal is to enhance the interests of consumers through effective competition and more innovative ways of delivering legal services.”

The organisation has appointed a panel of specialist advisers: Philip Havers QC, of 1 Crown Office Row; Helga Breen of Lawrence Graham; Stephanie Grundy; Louise Jones of 1 Temple Gardens; and Trading Terms Ltd.

Its general advisers are 39 Essex Street and Lovells (main contacts are partner Paul Dacam and associate Charles Brasted).

Bruce Macmillan, general counsel of the Legal Services Board, says: “We are pleased to announce this panel, which brings together some very authoritative figures and teams from across the legal landscape. The services they provide, both as individuals and as a panel, will provide valuable support to the lawyers working within the Legal Service Board.”
 

Issue: 7399 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll