header-logo header-logo

Lessons from Candey

01 November 2018 / Grania Langdon-Down
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Fees
printer mail-detail

​A series of recent decisions provide important guidance for litigators over securing fees when a client goes bust, says Grania Langdon-Down

London litigation boutique CANDEY (Candey) acted for Peak Hotels and Resorts Limited (Peak) in a highly charged takeover battle in the luxury hotel industry running across four jurisdictions. When Peak subsequently went into liquidation, the law firm found itself in dispute with the liquidators at KPMG, Russell Crumpler and Sarah Bower, over its fees.

Ashkhan Candey, the law firm’s managing partner and head of corporate and commercial disputes, says: ‘The question what to do when your client goes bust is a critical issue for law firms, whether the case is being funded by fixed fees, conditional fee agreements (CFAs) or damages-based agreements (DBAs).’

His firm had agreed a fixed fee of £3.8m to help Peak’s cash flow halfway through the litigation. By the time the hotel company went into liquidation, Candey had done about £1.2m of work based on its usual hourly rates. The law firm claimed to be a secured creditor for the full

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll