header-logo header-logo

01 November 2018 / Grania Langdon-Down
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Fees
printer mail-detail

Lessons from Candey

​A series of recent decisions provide important guidance for litigators over securing fees when a client goes bust, says Grania Langdon-Down

London litigation boutique CANDEY (Candey) acted for Peak Hotels and Resorts Limited (Peak) in a highly charged takeover battle in the luxury hotel industry running across four jurisdictions. When Peak subsequently went into liquidation, the law firm found itself in dispute with the liquidators at KPMG, Russell Crumpler and Sarah Bower, over its fees.

Ashkhan Candey, the law firm’s managing partner and head of corporate and commercial disputes, says: ‘The question what to do when your client goes bust is a critical issue for law firms, whether the case is being funded by fixed fees, conditional fee agreements (CFAs) or damages-based agreements (DBAs).’

His firm had agreed a fixed fee of £3.8m to help Peak’s cash flow halfway through the litigation. By the time the hotel company went into liquidation, Candey had done about £1.2m of work based on its usual hourly rates. The law firm claimed to be a secured creditor for the full

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll