header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Lessons from the housing frontline

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
16 February 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
nlj_7734_hyness

The government should rethink its plans to revamp the legal aid housing duty scheme, says Steve Hynes

It seems price competition is an issue which just will not go away in the world of legal aid. A year after solicitors successfully fought off plans to introduce competitive tenders for police station and magistrates’ court duty work, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has announced a consultation on introducing price competitive tenders for Housing Possession Court Duty Schemes (HPCDS). The move has met with widespread condemnation from groups representing solicitors, including the Law Society and the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG).

Chris Minnoch (Operations Director at LAPG) says that the organisation, which mainly represents civil legal aid providers, has “serious concerns” about the proposed tenders. Minnoch believes that the LAA’s plan to reduce the number of contracts by two thirds through increasing the size of the geographic areas covered by the tenders would risk smaller providers losing out to large firms. While Minnoch believes the large firms would find the proposed contracts more attractive “as they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: AI boom collides with courtroom reality
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll