header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Lessons from the housing frontline

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
16 February 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
nlj_7734_hyness

The government should rethink its plans to revamp the legal aid housing duty scheme, says Steve Hynes

It seems price competition is an issue which just will not go away in the world of legal aid. A year after solicitors successfully fought off plans to introduce competitive tenders for police station and magistrates’ court duty work, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has announced a consultation on introducing price competitive tenders for Housing Possession Court Duty Schemes (HPCDS). The move has met with widespread condemnation from groups representing solicitors, including the Law Society and the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG).

Chris Minnoch (Operations Director at LAPG) says that the organisation, which mainly represents civil legal aid providers, has “serious concerns” about the proposed tenders. Minnoch believes that the LAA’s plan to reduce the number of contracts by two thirds through increasing the size of the geographic areas covered by the tenders would risk smaller providers losing out to large firms. While Minnoch believes the large firms would find the proposed contracts more attractive “as they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The pension split at 25
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
NLJ this week: Exclusion zone?
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll