header-logo header-logo

16 April 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lewis Silkin—Duran Ross

Firm strengthens dispute resolution practice with new partner hire

Lewis Silkin has added commercial disputes specialist Duran Ross as a partner in the firm’s dispute resolution team.

An experienced commercial disputes practitioner, Duran originally trained at Lewis Silkin before continuing his career at a magic circle firm and a boutique disputes practice.

Duran has acted on matters including High Court proceedings and arbitration claims, ranging from sports and technology disputes to contentious insolvencies and professional negligence claims.

He has represented both claimants and defendants, with clients including major banks, insolvency practitioners, start-ups, sports brands, founders, FTSE 100 CEOs, family offices and high net worth individuals, as well as group claimants.

Duran’s specialism in insolvency disputes has seen him obtain the Certificate of Proficiency in Insolvency from the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA).

Having worked in coding and website design before entering the law, Duran has a particular interest in disputes relating to technology. He is a member of the IPA, the International Association of Young Lawyers and the London Solicitors Litigation Association.

Mark Lim, partner and head of the dispute resolution group at Lewis Silkin, said: ‘Having worked with Duran closely at the start of his career, it’s a personal pleasure to welcome him back to Lewis Silkin, now as a partner. Duran brings with him valuable experience in complex, multinational litigation and arbitration, as well as a genuine specialism and interest in insolvency matters and high value proceedings involving technology. As we continue to deepen our dispute resolution bench strength across our core markets, Duran is a fantastic addition to the team and we welcome him warmly.’

Duran added: ‘Knowing the firm well already, I’m delighted to be continuing to build my career with Lewis Silkin. Mark and the team have grown the dispute resolution practice considerably in recent years, bolstered by the firm’s deep expertise and understanding of its clients’ sectors—so it’s exciting to be back.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll