header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Libel and slander—Defamatory words—Words capable of defamatory meaning

McGrath v Independent Print Ltd [2013] EWHC 2202 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 35 (Aug)
 

Queen’s Bench Division, Nicola Davies J, 26 Jul 2013

The law of defamation does not provide a remedy for inconsequential statements of trivial content or import. It is necessary that there should be some threshold of seriousness to avoid normal social banter or discourtesy resulting in litigation and to avoid interfering with the right of freedom of expression conferred by Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. To be defamatory a statement has to substantially affect, in an adverse manner, the attitude of other people towards a person or have a tendency to do so.

The claimant appeared in person. Jonathan Price and Robert Dougans (instructed by Bryan Cave Solicitors) for the defendant.

In 2010, the claimant published under the pseudonym “Scrooby” a book entitled The Attempted Murder of God: Hidden Science You Really Need to Know. In the same year, Professor Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinov published a book called Grand

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll