header-logo header-logo

Libel and slander—Defamatory words—Words capable of defamatory meaning

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

McGrath v Independent Print Ltd [2013] EWHC 2202 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 35 (Aug)
 

Queen’s Bench Division, Nicola Davies J, 26 Jul 2013

The law of defamation does not provide a remedy for inconsequential statements of trivial content or import. It is necessary that there should be some threshold of seriousness to avoid normal social banter or discourtesy resulting in litigation and to avoid interfering with the right of freedom of expression conferred by Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. To be defamatory a statement has to substantially affect, in an adverse manner, the attitude of other people towards a person or have a tendency to do so.

The claimant appeared in person. Jonathan Price and Robert Dougans (instructed by Bryan Cave Solicitors) for the defendant.

In 2010, the claimant published under the pseudonym “Scrooby” a book entitled The Attempted Murder of God: Hidden Science You Really Need to Know. In the same year, Professor Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinov published a book called Grand

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll