header-logo header-logo

Libel and slander—Defamatory words—Words capable of defamatory meaning

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

McGrath v Independent Print Ltd [2013] EWHC 2202 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 35 (Aug)
 

Queen’s Bench Division, Nicola Davies J, 26 Jul 2013

The law of defamation does not provide a remedy for inconsequential statements of trivial content or import. It is necessary that there should be some threshold of seriousness to avoid normal social banter or discourtesy resulting in litigation and to avoid interfering with the right of freedom of expression conferred by Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. To be defamatory a statement has to substantially affect, in an adverse manner, the attitude of other people towards a person or have a tendency to do so.

The claimant appeared in person. Jonathan Price and Robert Dougans (instructed by Bryan Cave Solicitors) for the defendant.

In 2010, the claimant published under the pseudonym “Scrooby” a book entitled The Attempted Murder of God: Hidden Science You Really Need to Know. In the same year, Professor Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinov published a book called Grand

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll