header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Libel and slander—Privilege—Extra-Parliamentary inquiry

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Makudi v Baron Triesman of Tottenham [2014] EWCA Civ 179

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Laws, Tomlinson and Rafferty LJJ, 26 February 2014

A claim in defamation was brought against the defendant for repeating at an extra-Parliamentary inquiry his evidence before a Parliamentary committee. It was held he was immune from the claim, by virtue of Art 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689.

Andrew Goddard QC and Simon Crawshaw (instructed by Watson Farley & Williams LLP) for the claimant. Andrew Caldecott QC and Clare Kissin (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the defendant.

The defendant was the former chairman of the English Football Association (the FA) and of the England 2018 Football World Cup bid. In May 2011, he gave evidence to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee of the House of Commons (the CMSC), during the course of which he made allegations that members of the FIFA executive committee had been unduly influenced by improper behaviour. After the hearing, the FA appointed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll