header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Libel & slander

Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 94 (Mar)

The Queen’s Bench Division ruled as defamatory two tweets posted by the defendant, columnist and radio host Katie Hopkins, which were directed at the claimant, blogger and journalist Jack Monroe. The serious harm requirement of s 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 was met and the defendant was ordered to pay the claimant £24,000 in compensation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
A significant High Court decision has provided welcome clarification on how far legal advice privilege can extend within large corporate organisations
back-to-top-scroll