header-logo header-logo

Licensing

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v Albert Court Residents’ Association and others [2011] EWCA Civ 430, [2011] All ER (D) 118 (Apr)

Neither the Licensing Act 2003 (LA 2003), nor the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/42), imposed any duty on a licensing authority to advertise an application or to take any steps to notify anyone affected by it that it had been made. The sole duty to advertise and to give notice of an application was placed on the person making the application. An otherwise legitimate expectation could not require a public authority to act contrary to statute. Any failure by an authority to act in relation to its extra-statutory notifications could not give rise to any right to interfere with the performance of its statutory duties. When exercising any discretion or power of decision under LA 2003, a licensing authority had to do so with a view to promoting the licensing objectives. However, once the authority was under an unqualified duty to carry out an act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll