header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Licensing

Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v Albert Court Residents’ Association and others [2011] EWCA Civ 430, [2011] All ER (D) 118 (Apr)

Neither the Licensing Act 2003 (LA 2003), nor the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/42), imposed any duty on a licensing authority to advertise an application or to take any steps to notify anyone affected by it that it had been made. The sole duty to advertise and to give notice of an application was placed on the person making the application. An otherwise legitimate expectation could not require a public authority to act contrary to statute. Any failure by an authority to act in relation to its extra-statutory notifications could not give rise to any right to interfere with the performance of its statutory duties. When exercising any discretion or power of decision under LA 2003, a licensing authority had to do so with a view to promoting the licensing objectives. However, once the authority was under an unqualified duty to carry out an act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll