header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life changing decisions

Julian Samiloff reflects on the battle for and against assisted suicide

Debbie Purdy has multiple sclerosis. As the disease progresses life may become so unbearable that she may wish to end her life. She fears that eventually the disease will rob her of the physical ability to do the act herself so that if she chooses suicide she will require assistance. However, assisted suicide is a criminal offence (Suicide Act 1961 (SA 1961), s 2(1)(4)) so that if anyone was to help her in any way they would risk liability and imprisonment; even helping Debbie Purdy to travel to a Swiss clinic where she would get lawful assistance to die would expose helpers to that liability, and, contemplating imprisonment for her husband was not an option for her.

Pretty
In a similar case, R (Pretty) v DPP (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2001] UKHL 61, [2002] 1 All ER 1, Diane Pretty claimed that if SA 1961, s 2 prevented her assisted suicide or the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) undertaking not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll