header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life changing decisions

Julian Samiloff reflects on the battle for and against assisted suicide

Debbie Purdy has multiple sclerosis. As the disease progresses life may become so unbearable that she may wish to end her life. She fears that eventually the disease will rob her of the physical ability to do the act herself so that if she chooses suicide she will require assistance. However, assisted suicide is a criminal offence (Suicide Act 1961 (SA 1961), s 2(1)(4)) so that if anyone was to help her in any way they would risk liability and imprisonment; even helping Debbie Purdy to travel to a Swiss clinic where she would get lawful assistance to die would expose helpers to that liability, and, contemplating imprisonment for her husband was not an option for her.

Pretty
In a similar case, R (Pretty) v DPP (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2001] UKHL 61, [2002] 1 All ER 1, Diane Pretty claimed that if SA 1961, s 2 prevented her assisted suicide or the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) undertaking not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll