header-logo header-logo

05 August 2010 / James Riby
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

A life saver?

family_0_5

James Riby expounds on interim relief & the division of chattels

Interim applications in matrimonial finance proceedings regarding rights over property tend to be forgotten and unrequired by practitioners, save for applications for “maintenance pending suit” (MPS). These interim maintenance payments are designed to cover immediate living expenses, such as rent, mortgage and food, and can also cover funding for legal fees in certain “exceptional circumstances” which the courts have identified. They are designed to last until final agreement or final hearing, when the court has jurisdiction to make a range of property orders: lump sum; transfer of property (which can include sale); pension share; and long-term periodical payments. For many litigants MPS can be a financial life-saver, particularly at times like these of extreme pressure on court lists and judicial time.

Jurisdiction

The MPS jurisdiction appears enough for the interim needs of most cases but in others, albeit seemingly rarer, there is a need for the court to be able to make provision for other forms of interim relief.  Below are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll