header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Lights, camera, action!

Andrew Keogh on plans to introduce virtual courts

The Legal Services Commission, under instruction from the Office for Criminal Justice Reform, has consulted on amendments to the unifi ed
criminal contract that would provide the framework for the introduction of “virtual courts” in early 2009. What is proposed is that once a person is charged with an off ence at a police station they would appear, via video-link, “before” a magistrates’ court within two hours. Th e defendant would not leave the police station, or if he were to be bailed, he would have to return a short time later for the video-link appearance. The scheme would run into the early evening, and would later be extended to late evening.

Video-link
There is nothing new in video-link technology, it was fi rst legislated for in the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and has proved to be a popular, sensible and proportionate way to conduct a large number of hearings. Expensive prisoner movements have been dramatically reduced and hearings are in the main conducted more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll