header-logo header-logo

28 March 2019 / Scott Taylor
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Limitation: back on track?

Scott Taylor considers the appropriate use of ‘standstill’ agreements in claims for financial provision

  • Bhusate v Patel and Cowan v Foreman: the facts; reconciling the judgments; and the implications of the cases.

In Bhusate v Patel [2019] EWHC 470 (Ch) Mrs B, the claimant, was the widow of the deceased who died intestate on 28 April 1990. She was Mr Bhusate’s third wife. Together they had one child. Mr Bhusate had had five children with his first wife who were aged between 54 and 72 at the time of the hearing and relations between four of those children and the claimant were not good as they objected to her receiving anything from their father’s estate, which they regarded as belonging to their mother who had died some years previously.

The estate

The estate was limited, with the main asset being the house (valued at £850,000) and around £1,500 in bank accounts. The claimant and the second eldest of the deceased’s children (with whom the claimant enjoyed a reasonably supportive relationship)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll