header-logo header-logo

25 February 2026
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Limits lifted on days in court to tackle backlog

The criminal courts will sit to their maximum capacity next year, after the Lord Chancellor David Lammy lifted the cap on Crown Court sitting days

Lammy said a £2.75bn settlement for courts and tribunals in the next financial year has been agreed. The magistrates’ courts will be funded to their highest operational capacity, and three-year commitments have been made to provide long-term stability.

Law Society president Mark Evans urged the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to ‘make this effective’ by ensuring ‘there are enough judges, court staff, prosecutors and defence lawyers to work on the cases.

‘It must also overcome issues such as prisoners not being delivered to court on time.’

The backlog in the Crown Court currently stands at about 80,000 cases, with some trials currently being listed for 2030. In 2024, the MoJ capped Crown Court sitting days to 105,000 per year, 2% lower than the 107,700 days in the previous year when the days were uncapped.

Bar Council chair Kirsty Brimelow KC said: ‘We have long called for the limit on the number of days that courts can sit to be removed and are encouraged that this is being implemented.

‘However, we continue to oppose the government’s proposed restriction of jury trials. It will drain precious resources away from the needed reforms that can be implemented now and place additional pressure on a stretched and stressed workforce.’

Lammy confirmed this week he will proceed with controversial plans to reduce the number of jury trials by changing the threshold. In a letter to Justice Select Committee chair Andy Slaughter last week, justice minister Sarah Sackman confirmed the changes will apply to cases already listed, including those past the point of trial determination.

Criminal Bar Association chair Riel Karmy-Jones KC said: ‘We estimate that up to 30,000 cases will be affected by the decision to apply the changes retrospectively.

‘This ill-conceived idea will mire the Crown Courts in satellite litigation for months or years to come.’ She predicted ‘many thousands of additional pre-trial hearings’ resulting in multiple appeals, ‘with thousands of other cases then waiting on those appeals for guidance’.

Issue: 8151 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll