header-logo header-logo

Lit over split

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them be resolved...

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them (where one of them will not accept a determination by HMRC) be resolved by way of a specific issue application under the Children Act 1989 if they so consent?

The court would have to be satisfied that the dispute involved an aspect of parental responsibility which means “all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities...which by law a parent has in relation to the child and his property” (s 3(1) of the Children Act 1989). There are arguments both ways as to whether this would embrace a child benefit dispute. The child benefit is not the child’s property as it belongs to the parents. On the other hand, payment to one parent in a shared residence situation may cause hardship to the other party and it could be of benefit to the child for the court to be able to make a determination. Depending on the circumstances, an appropriate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll