header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lit over split

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them be resolved...

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them (where one of them will not accept a determination by HMRC) be resolved by way of a specific issue application under the Children Act 1989 if they so consent?

The court would have to be satisfied that the dispute involved an aspect of parental responsibility which means “all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities...which by law a parent has in relation to the child and his property” (s 3(1) of the Children Act 1989). There are arguments both ways as to whether this would embrace a child benefit dispute. The child benefit is not the child’s property as it belongs to the parents. On the other hand, payment to one parent in a shared residence situation may cause hardship to the other party and it could be of benefit to the child for the court to be able to make a determination. Depending on the circumstances, an appropriate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll