header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lit over split

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them be resolved...

Can a dispute between parents about how they divide child benefit between them (where one of them will not accept a determination by HMRC) be resolved by way of a specific issue application under the Children Act 1989 if they so consent?

The court would have to be satisfied that the dispute involved an aspect of parental responsibility which means “all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities...which by law a parent has in relation to the child and his property” (s 3(1) of the Children Act 1989). There are arguments both ways as to whether this would embrace a child benefit dispute. The child benefit is not the child’s property as it belongs to the parents. On the other hand, payment to one parent in a shared residence situation may cause hardship to the other party and it could be of benefit to the child for the court to be able to make a determination. Depending on the circumstances, an appropriate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll