header-logo header-logo

18 October 2024 / Nicola Beasley
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Mental health , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Litigation capacity & mental health

193151
Divorce & family breakdown are often accompanied by mental health problems. Nicola Beasley explains how family lawyers can work with clients who lack or lose capacity
  • Explains the concept of litigation capacity, and how family lawyers can identify if clients have capacity.
  • Differentiates between litigation capacity and decision-making.
  • Sets out practice points for cases in which clients lose, or do not have, litigation capacity.

It is not uncommon for family law practitioners to come up against obstacles in their cases, from complex financial negotiations, to hidden assets, to allegations from one party to the other. Divorce and family breakdown are rarely smooth. Unsurprisingly, considering the context of what clients are going through, some have mental health problems. Clients are often facing one of the most challenging times of their lives, as everything they have known collapses around them.

In some cases, practitioners may have clients who lack or lose litigation capacity, whether this is temporary or permanent. In some cases, loss of litigation capacity can be caused by mental health

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll