header-logo header-logo

Litigation capacity & mental health

18 October 2024 / Nicola Beasley
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Mental health , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
193151
Divorce & family breakdown are often accompanied by mental health problems. Nicola Beasley explains how family lawyers can work with clients who lack or lose capacity
  • Explains the concept of litigation capacity, and how family lawyers can identify if clients have capacity.
  • Differentiates between litigation capacity and decision-making.
  • Sets out practice points for cases in which clients lose, or do not have, litigation capacity.

It is not uncommon for family law practitioners to come up against obstacles in their cases, from complex financial negotiations, to hidden assets, to allegations from one party to the other. Divorce and family breakdown are rarely smooth. Unsurprisingly, considering the context of what clients are going through, some have mental health problems. Clients are often facing one of the most challenging times of their lives, as everything they have known collapses around them.

In some cases, practitioners may have clients who lack or lose litigation capacity, whether this is temporary or permanent. In some cases, loss of litigation capacity can be caused by mental health

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll