header-logo header-logo

Litigation capacity & mental health

18 October 2024 / Nicola Beasley
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Mental health , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
193151
Divorce & family breakdown are often accompanied by mental health problems. Nicola Beasley explains how family lawyers can work with clients who lack or lose capacity
  • Explains the concept of litigation capacity, and how family lawyers can identify if clients have capacity.
  • Differentiates between litigation capacity and decision-making.
  • Sets out practice points for cases in which clients lose, or do not have, litigation capacity.

It is not uncommon for family law practitioners to come up against obstacles in their cases, from complex financial negotiations, to hidden assets, to allegations from one party to the other. Divorce and family breakdown are rarely smooth. Unsurprisingly, considering the context of what clients are going through, some have mental health problems. Clients are often facing one of the most challenging times of their lives, as everything they have known collapses around them.

In some cases, practitioners may have clients who lack or lose litigation capacity, whether this is temporary or permanent. In some cases, loss of litigation capacity can be caused by mental health issues.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll